We are getting to the point where there are a lot of options that determine
which implementation is "best".  We could take a stab at creating a
BloomFIlterFactory that takes a Shape as an argument and does a "finger in
the air" guestimate of which implementation best fits.  Store values in
long blocks or as integers in a list, that sort of thing.  Perhaps in a
month or so when we really have some idea.



On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 2:16 PM Claude Warren <cla...@xenei.com> wrote:

> You don't need Iterator<IndexCount> iterator() as we have forEachCount(
> BitCountConsumer )
>
> I guess we need something like add( Iterator<IndexCount>) or add(
> Collection<IndexCount> ) or add( Stream<IndexCount> )
>
> It would be nice if we could have a BitCountProducer class that we could
> just pass to an add() method.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:50 AM Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 18 Mar 2020, at 11:14, Claude Warren <cla...@xenei.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On a slightly different note.  CountingBloomFilters have no way to
>> perform
>> > a reload.  All other bloom filters you can dump the bits and reload
>> > (trivial) but if you preserve the counts from a bloom filter and want to
>> > reload them you can't.  We need a constructor that takes the index,count
>> > pairs somehow.
>>
>> Iterator<int[]> ?
>>
>> Or foolproof:
>>
>> class IndexCount {
>>     final int index;
>>     final int count;
>>     // ...
>> }
>>
>> Iterator<IndexCount>
>>
>>
>> The CountingBloomFilter already has a method forEachCount(…).
>>
>> I was reluctant to add some sort of iterator:
>>
>> Iterator<?> iterator()
>>
>> But we could put in:
>>
>> Iterator<IndexCount> iterator()
>>
>> It would be inefficient but at least it is fool-proof. The operation is
>> unlikely to be used very often.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> <http://like-like.xenei.com>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Reply via email to