Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 22:20, Alex Herbert <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > On 9 Apr 2020, at 16:32, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Given this I am thinking that using ZERO when possible is a better > >> option and avoid 0 / -1. > > > > Hmm, then I'm both +0 and -0 (which is the same, right?) > > on this issue. ;-) > > Ironically the conversion to a double is a minor bug: > > Fraction.of(0, 1).doubleValue() == 0.0 > Fraction.of(0, -01).doubleValue() == -0.0 > > IEEE754 arithmetic for 0.0 / -1.0 creates a -0.0. > > Do we want to support -0.0?
Why prevent it since it looks expected from the above call? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
