my opinion: until you are sure the master can pass jdk14, move it to [allow
failure].
here is an example.
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/commit/249d1dc9fb3f2bd5209aaa299c4ed61414f1fd78#diff-354f30a63fb0907d4ad57269548329e3


adding a unpassable check in travis will makes all pull requests/commit
return builld failure, which will hide problem and make checker's life hard.

Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> 于2020年5月13日周三 下午10:46写道:

> On 2020-05-13, Peter Lee wrote:
>
> >  Hi,all
>
> > The travis build of Compress is failing now cause the openjdk14 was added
> > to travis.yml recently. The reason is the Pack200 was removed from JDK14
> > and there was a discussion about it in January. Emmanuel is working on
> his
> > replacement project(https://github.com/pack200/pack200) but not finished
> > yet. Seems we have no good replacement for now.
>
> > I'm thinking we should disable openjdk14 in travis before we have find a
> > solution for this. WDYT?
>
> I'm fine with disabling the travis build for now.
>
> Had a quick look through JIRA as I was totally sure there must be an
> issue tracking this, but it seems I haven't created any. Anyway with the
> last release announcement I promised we'd deal with JDK14 for the next
> release - one way or the other. :-)
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to