Gilles,
Thanks for replying. I do not know (yet) if Commons Geometry has the same 
issues (or even other issues), but I would rather use something being actively 
developed vs. something that is EOL (Commons-Math3 v3.6.1 was released 4+ years 
ago). At least this way, I can report/fix any bugs and get the improvements 
with the new releases. And yes, I'm willing to be the first test subject. __  I 
would love to help with more improvements, but if there is no sight for the 
releases and the library thus cannot be used, I can't justify spending time on 
it.


Commons Devs,
Adding the Commons Dev ML per Gilles's request. In the email below, I asked 
when the first release of Commons Geometry will be. Some context (and intro): 
using Commons-Math3, I write geometry algorithms for our UAV flight management 
product at AiRXOS (part of GE Aviation). However, I'm discovering bugs in 
Commons-Math3, one of which I helped fix in Commons Geometry. I would like to 
use Commons Geometry instead (for reasons mentioned above).

Regards,
Baljit


On 5/21/20, 9:02 PM, "Gilles Sadowski" <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hello.
    
    2020-05-21 20:32 UTC+02:00, Singh, Baljit (GE Aviation, US) 
<balsi...@ge.com>:
    > Hi Matt, Gilles,
    >
    > Any updates on when the commons-geometry release is going to be?
    
    The question is of general interest.  Could you please post it
    to the "dev" ML?
    
    > I’m finding
    > more and more issues with the package
    > org.apache.commons.math3.geometry.spherical.twod, and its causing issues
    > with our product.
    
    Is the code in "Commons Geometry" free of those issues?
    It would be nice to have unit tests that check those cases.
    
    > I would like to upgrade to something that is actively
    > being developed.
    
    Sure.
    So, you are user number "1" (?). ;-)
    
    > Looking at JIRA, it looks like the release is almost ready,
    > only 3 (minor) issues to go.
    
    If you can help with those...
    
    Thanks,
    Gilles
    
    > Regards,
    > Baljit
    >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to