I am ok with Java 8 as the requirement. Gary
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 06:16 T. Schapitz <t.schap...@online.de> wrote: > Hi there, > > maybe a bit late in the game, because the original post regarding this > topic was 9 months ago, but i think there is a good case for skipping > directly to JDK 8: > > If we opt for utilizing not only the java.lang.ProcessBuilder introduced > in JDK 1.5, but also the additional methods for stream inheritance and > stream redirection(*) introduced in 6 & 7, this will likely be done by > introducing additional methods into the API interfaces, whether it is > the CommandLauncher or the Executor. But this could potentially break > backward compatibility for users of common-exec, that implemented those > interfaces. (Granted, it's rather unlikely somebody did this - most > would rather be extending DefaultExecutor). But problems like this could > easily avoided by adding default implementations introduced with JDK 8. > > Btw: who would be reviewing a pull request, if I had one? Is currently > somebody reviewing working on the issues? > > (I'm just trying to get a feel for the project, and want to avoid > duplication) > > Thomas > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
