>> For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only >> gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have only >> two committers in commons-lang.
> Are there JIRA reports? My log here is: LANG-1545 merged by gary LANG-1561 merged by gary LANG-1563 merged by gary LANG-1562 merged by gary LANG-1564 merged by gary LANG-1560 merged by gary LANG-1552 merged by gary LANG-1553 merged by gary LANG-1554 merged by gary LANG-1555 merged by gary LANG-1558 merged by gary LANG-1559 merged by gary LANG-1556 merged by gary LANG-1565 merged by gary LANG-1557 merged by gary LANG-1546 merged by kinow LANG-1549 merged by chtompki pending: 10+ sub-quests in LANG-1573 pending, for near 1 month already. most of which is performance refines in StringUtils. I'm not requesting somebody must review my pr now or something. And I know committers are busy. I say this just for showing, in my view, we really have no enough reviewers. And if somebody has any ideas about how we can solve this, by making more reviewers or making current non-active committers more active, or other more advice... Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月26日周日 下午5:27写道： > 2020-07-26 5:00 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com>: > >>GitHub is basically our interactive pull request interface. If we didn’t > > have that, I bet we’d be running GitLab ourselves or similar. > > > > Yes, that is what I think gitbox lacks. > > As Matt says above, the functionality is there. As noted in my > previous message, my understanding is that the GitHub mirroring > was chosen (by Apache INFRA) specifically and exclusively for its > ability to provide that functionality. > > > Cannot imagine a git-based website having no convenient pr system... > > The purpose of a web viewer that display Apache's repositories > is different (e.g. I use it to provide links in discussion on here or > in JIRA). > > >>Also, being that the bar to be a committer here is fairly low, getting > > access to gitbox directly isn’t too difficult. > > This is decided by what you mean 'low'... > > Matt's statement allows for a lot of interpretation. ;-) > But it's another discussion... > > > As far as I can see in my prs, most of the time I need to wait for very > > long to get reviewed. > > The probable cause is the lack of time on the part of those > who are the primary maintainers of the component. > > Another could be that is has been forgotten. If you think > that it might be the case, you can send a nudge here. > > > I think that can indicate the fact that we have no enough committers(or > no > > enough reviewers). > > Indeed, there aren't enough active committers. > As Stefan indicated: > 1. the "Commons" team has dwindled and > 2. new contributors often don't stay around enough to show > a sustained interest in any component such that the primary > maintainers feel confident to give them write access. > > > Or, quite some committers only focus on their own prs, but not do any > > reviews? > > There are so many components that most committers > feel confident to make significant changes only in 2 or 3. > > > For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only > > gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have > only > > two committers in commons-lang. > > Are there JIRA reports? > > Gilles > > >> [...] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
