Hello John. Le mer. 19 août 2020 à 23:38, John Patrick <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I've now closed all PR's, and deleted the source branches. > > Giles I've pushed the changes back into my commons-lang fork, so this > would recreate that branch > https://github.com/nhojpatrick/apache_commons-lang/pull/new/takari.maven-wrapper. > > The PR if raised again, would include changes needed for github > workflow, travis and Jenkinsfile, also documentation updates. > > You don't need to use mvnw if you are an advanced user with a specific > use case and know what you're doing. But for 90% of use cases just > saying use mvnw will be fine, advising mvnw won't stop you using mvn > to perform builds. > > Everytime I install a new Java 15 or 16 EA version, and update my > toolchains.xml, I normally delete both ~/.m2/wrapper and > ~/.m2/repository at the same time so regularly spring clean. So I'll > only have an old version of maven if I've needed to build an older > branch which was designed to be used on an older maven. Most modern > new CI's are creating slaves on demand per execution, so it won't > slowly build up older maven wrapper versions like the old style > jenkins slave.
Thanks for the explanations. The [Math] component could be used as guinea pig. Best regards, Gilles > > John > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 22:23, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Le mer. 19 août 2020 à 22:49, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> a écrit > > : > > > > > > The consensus is do nothing IMO. > > > > "Those who do the work" etc. (see below). > > > > > > > > What I really dislike is that if I have 20 components that over time end > > > up > > > containing 20 different versions of these > > > Cmd/Sh/JavaSource/PropertiesFiles > > > that point to 20 different versions of Maven, and I build everything, I'll > > > end up with 20 different versions of Maven downloaded on my machine that I > > > did not ask. > > > > That seems like "business as usual" for maven-based development... > > But I'd tend to agree that it must at least be optional. > > Is someone willing to demonstrate that it is so, i.e. make the > > needed changes (for a single component)? > > > > Regards, > > Gilles > > > > >>> [...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
