Le mar. 9 mars 2021 à 11:58, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:39, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Le mar. 9 mars 2021 à 01:41, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > Most of the Commons projects show up in GitHub as having the Apache 2.0 > > > License > > > > > > However a few show up as 'other': > > > > > > commons-codec > > > commons-csv > > > commons-dbutils > > > commons-exec > > > commons-jelly > > > commons-logging > > > commons-math > > > commons-rdf > > > commons-text > > > commons-weaver > > > > > > AFAICT this is because there is more than 1 LICENSE file at the top level: > > > I forked codec and deleted the LICENSE-header.txt file, and the > > > license then showed up as AL 2.0. > > > > For commons-math, there is a single license file; so the reason > > must be different. Perhaps the contents (several sections were > > added below the license text)? > > Should those be moved to the "NOTICE" file? > > I don't thnk that is allowed. > NOTICE is for required attributions only.
So, after all, do you mean that 1. GitHub is just wrong in not detecting that CM is AL2.0, and 2. there is nothing to change for CM ? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
