On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 11:55, Matt Juntunen <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready > this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and > commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct? > > Thanks. Definitely omit commons-numbers-complex-streams. There was a discussion a while back about an alternative to this module that would represent arrays of complex numbers using just arrays of primitives for the real and imaginary parts. Looking at commons-numbers-arrays it only has two classes: MultidimensionalCounter SortInPlace The latter was recently ported from Commons Math. For that class there is a warning about using varargs for the signature of BiConsumer<double[], double[][]>. It is using accept(double[], double[]...). I am not sure if this is a real problem or not. The varargs is not allowed in the BiConsumer signature. So perhaps it should be removed from the implementation of the method. Alex
