FYI, I'm planning to start the geometry release process within the next couple of days instead of waiting for the RNG release as mentioned previously. (Geometry only uses RNG for unit tests and benchmarks.) The reasons for this change of plans is that (1) I have need of the code in other projects and (2) I have time now to do the release but will most likely not later on. Please let me know if you have any objections.
Regards, Matt J On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 7:25 AM Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 02:32, Matt Juntunen <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Then, as a matter of preference, I'd still suggest that "Commons RNG" > > > be released first (if the latter's next release is pending). > > > > Ok. Any thoughts on a timeline for that? > > > > I am currently looking at it. > > The dryRun build of the release profile now works under JDK 11.0.11. This > is good. Previously JDK 11 complained about the JPMS modules using code > from packages in the unnamed module and this errored the build. It had to > be released using JDK 9. Now the latest JDK has a more lenient javadoc tool > and the warnings are printed but it does not fail the build. > > I am going to try updating the modules to use Java 11 in-place of Java 9 > and see if that works. It would be preferable to release the example JPMS > modules built using the first LTS version to support modules (i.e. JDK 11 > not not JDK 9). > > Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
