On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:45 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:36, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why not just run dependabot weekly. We move slowly enough that weekly
> currently works. Until we can get more hands on the project, slower comms
> are indeed reasonable…right?
>
> Weekly runs won't reduce the number of emails, except where a single
> dependency has been updated twice in a week.
>

I'm baffled by your reply: If I get one email a day for a week for a new
dependency version, that's 7 emails. If I get one email a week for a
dependency, let me see..., that's one a week. So it's seven times LESS.

Gary

>
> I don't see how it is possible to reduce the noise from dependabot.
>
> > -Rob
> >
> > > On Dec 29, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Saving dev/human resources is about having a CI, all mentionned
> plugins of
> > > the thread support it properly while cronned.
> > > Difference is the scope of the checks: CVE only, all deps, plugins and
> code
> > > (which is where most people don't like since it is trivial to have
> false
> > > positive and dependabot falls there).
> > >
> > > I agree CVE are a crucial topic but dependabot is NOT done for them,
> it is
> > > done for dependencies as a whole and is full of bugs so until it is
> refined
> > > to be more relevant and bulked differently (maybe *1* mail a week)
> then it
> > > is not an option for an everyday work IMHO.
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 15:18, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 13:54, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One critical feature is that dependabot does all the builds for you
> on
> > >>>> GitHub Actions, this is an enormous time and resource saver!
> > >>>
> > >>> Not at all.
> > >>> Just the reverse.
> > >>>
> > >>> It does NOT save resources, because it runs builds for updates that
> > >>> are not necessary at that point in time (or ever, in some cases).
> > >>>
> > >>> Nor does it same time, because the the noise that it generates.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>> Please stop pretending that Dependabot does things it does not (and
> > >>> likely cannot) do.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Oh, boy, Sebb, it feels like you are purposely misunderstanding my
> POV.
> > >> It's as simple as I stated:
> > >>
> > >> If Dependabot detects that a new version of a dependency is available,
> > >> creates a branch, runs a build, tells me the result and I have a PR I
> can
> > >> merge, *that is all work and time *I* do not have to do manually! Why
> is
> > >> that so hard to understand?*
> > >>
> > >> Gary
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>> Gary
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 08:51 Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Dec 29, 2021, at 8:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @Rob: dependabot is mainly about dependencies upgrades and it is
> > >>> also
> > >>>>> why
> > >>>>>> it is so chatty and has so much false positives.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, I am well aware. But I do not see how a robot telling you to
> > >>> simply
> > >>>>> upgrade is a problem?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Maybe I’m missing something but my impression is that’s what
> > >> dependabot
> > >>>>> does right? Tell you you need to upgrade?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Rob
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> If you want to focus on
> > >>>>>> CVE then setting up on the CI
> > >>>>>> https://sonatype.github.io/ossindex-maven/maven-plugin/ is way
> > >> more
> > >>>>>> efficient and accurate (basically when it fails you must act) so
> > >>>>> dependabot
> > >>>>>> is a great reporting tool for managers but not to work on an
> > >> everyday
> > >>>>> basis
> > >>>>>> IMHO until it is very finely configure but commons is far to need
> > >> so
> > >>> much
> > >>>>>> investment since there already have solutions for everything
> needed
> > >>> IMHO.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > >>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > >>>>>> <
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 14:39, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
> a
> > >>>>> écrit :
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Guys. I think dependabot is our greatest advantage in the work
> > >>> against
> > >>>>>>> security problems. I know she has her failings and is chatty.
> > >> But, I
> > >>>>> think
> > >>>>>>> we should open a line of thinking about how best she can help.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The reason she’s a pain in the ass is that we don’t have enough
> > >>> hands on
> > >>>>>>> the project making it better. I know I would help more, but I
> have
> > >>> to
> > >>>>> keep
> > >>>>>>> up with my father who’s a quadriplegic as well as a currently
> > >>> failing
> > >>>>>>> marriage.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The answer is that we need more hands on the project. I wish I
> > >>> could be
> > >>>>>>> those hands but time and priorities keep me chained.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>> -Rob
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2021, at 8:26 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
> > >> gillese...@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 12:18, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> a
> > >>> écrit
> > >>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>> Thank you, Phil. This thing is a P.I.T.A.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> In effect, from day one:
> > >>>>>>>> https://markmail.org/message/2vutc4p3b3eqv73f
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Basically, the argument is that
> > >>>>>>>> * the (dependabot) feature is too important to be disabled
> > >>>>>>>> * the annoyed people should filter out those mails (which I
> > >>>>>>>> did since no one at the time supported that they be diverted
> > >>>>>>>> to another ML).
> > >>>>>>>> Did anything change since then?
> > >>>>>>>> [Or do we eventually question the general anomaly that code
> > >>>>>>>> discussions have been almost completely off-loaded to GH?]
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Gilles
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Am 28.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Phil Steitz <
> > >>> phil.ste...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I can no longer effectively monitor commits@ due to the spam
> > >>>>>>> generated by this tool.  I am afraid my eyeballs aren't the only
> > >>> ones
> > >>>>> going
> > >>>>>>> missing here and that is a problem much more severe than any
> value
> > >>>>> provided
> > >>>>>>> by this tool, IMO.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Phil
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Bye, Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to