Le mar. 10 mai 2022 à 09:53, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 02:32, Matt Juntunen <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Sounds reasonable to me. Are there any arguments against this change > > other than the fact that it is not a japicmp default setting? > > > > I do not know why the setting default is at the current value. Unlike the > documentation for revapi there is limited explanation of the default > settings in japicmp and why compatibility for binary or source will be > broken. It may be that the developer explicitly wished to be informed of > additions to interfaces. > > Since this is unlikely to affect much at all it may be fine left as is in > commons parent. The configuration can be added to the relevant POM in > Commons RNG.
IIUC, it should be the other way around: If BC is not broken, the common Commons settings should not report otherwise, and if some specific component has additional requirements, let it modify its own POM. Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
