Dropping Clirr is fine by me but adding adding another plugin to do the same thing that JApiCmp is not (for me), it's confusing. A component can always choose to replace JApiCmp with revapi.
Gary On Mon, Aug 29, 2022, 05:50 <sma...@outlook.de> wrote: > Hi, > > as part of commons-csv pr 252< > https://github.com/apache/commons-csv/pull/252> there is a discussion > whether to add revapi-maven-plugin to commons-parent in addition to > japicmp-maven-plugin and drop clirr-maven-plugin. > The plugins perform checks to ensure source compatibility and binary > compatibility of artifacts. > > The proposal is that japicmp and revapi co-exist in parent as together the > tools provide better coverage than just having either one. > Clirr is not under active maintenance any longer and will be removed. > > Does anyone have thoughts or objections? > > cheers > Markus >
