On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 23:43, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I did not have time to track through whether this behaviour changed
> after the initial implementation of the flag. I would think not as the
> original behaviour is from 1.0. This would map to:
>
> true -> ALLOW_ALL
> false -> ALLOW_EMPTY
> new -> DISALLOW
>
> Which is what we currently have in 1.10.0 RC1. Thus the PR #276 [7] to
> change the use of the flag to 'false -> DISALLOW' is not maintaining
> behavioural compatibility (to 1.7, or back to 1.0).

PS. I just verified that PR 276 changes the DuplicateHeaderMode value
for allowDuplicates=false and does not change any tests.

So the test suite is currently not enforcing behavioural
compatibility. This seems like a glaring hole in the tests and should
be addressed to prevent regressions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to