OK, I will initiate a PR.
Some of the added methods will be more useful than others.
The PR will come from speters33w.

Thank you,
Stephan Peters

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 5:31 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Stephan,
>
> The best way to see what you are proposing is a PR, it's a bit painful to
> see differences otherwise, at least for me.
>
> That said anything new should solve a real world use case, not merely
> something that might be useful (or not) 😉
>
> I think seeing tests in a PR will help clarify what it is you are proposing
> that the current code doesn't do.
>
> See also also https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/450
>
> TY,
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 4:37 PM Stephan Peters
> <stephan.pet...@csuglobal.edu.invalid> wrote:
>
> > I added several methods to the org.apache.commons.CaseUtils class I think
> > would be very useful, for example to use for normalized naming
> conventions
> > for file paths, file names, URLs, etc.
> >
> > I'm planning on initiating a pull request.
> >
> > I would like to discuss it here.
> >
> > I've posted it in a fork here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/speters33w/commons-text/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/text/CaseUtils.java
> >
> > and written new tests for all the methods that pass here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/speters33w/commons-text/blob/master/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/text/CaseUtilsTest.java
> >
> > There is an example of the method return values at the top of the revised
> > CaseUtils.java.
> >
> > The methods have a little different behavior than the existing
> > toCamelCase(String, boolean, char[]) (which I left intact) in that they
> > normalize the input first before processing, so toCamelSnakeCase("The
> > café’s piñata gave me déjà vu.") will return
> > "the_Cafes_Pinata_Gave_Me_Deja_Vu"
> >
> > The main driver engine is in the toTitleCase() method and the rest of the
> > methods piggyback on that engine and perform minor changes to the return
> > value.
> >
> > If anyone feels like taking a look, I'd appreciate any feedback.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Stephan Peters
> >
>

Reply via email to