I am replying on this thread for completeness to say RC1 was canceled but with a modified message subject so your email client might not show the message in this thread:
- RC1 cancel message: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ck7nojw4djqt1jgg5zx0lh2pdn6l1fz2 - RC2 vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/hphmowhwpotz07dzvtfp90jcn24zscgc Thank you, Gary On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 8:17 AM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025, 08:02 Henri Biestro <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the review and the catch. >> My bad, I incorporated some grammar changes to get us closer to using javacc >> 6.0; this resurrected another case of 'block vs set' ambiguity. >> I agree that whether or not an annotation is present should not change the >> nature of what is evaluated; but annotating a block containing one >> expression should be favored over annotating a set literal. >> I'll restore the previous behavior and will try finding a 'better' rule. >> Cheers >> Henrib > > > Thank you Henri. I'll cut a release candidate when you're ready. It feels > like we are missing a test or set of tests for this type of use case. > > Gary >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
