On Tue, Jun 23, 2026, 14:01 Piotr P. Karwasz <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Gary,
>
> On 20.06.2026 16:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since the release of
> > Apache Commons JEXL 3.6.2, so I would like to release Apache Commons
> > JEXL 3.6.3.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> [x] +0 OK, but should this be version 3.7.0?


Hi Piotr,

I argued for version 3.7.0 with Hen due to the addition of new APIs in
keeping with semantic versioning, but he felt that 3.6.3 was thematically
appropriate. In this specific case, I think it's OK.

Gary


> Checksums, signatures, unit tests and reproducibility is OK as usual,
> but the JApiCmp shows:
>
> - A breaking change in jexl3.introspection (probably considered an
> internal package)
> - New methods in jexl3 and even a new type in jexl3.scripting.
>
> Piotr
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to