I don't see how you can anticipate anything productive, given the number of board members who think that the concept is evil, or, at least, counter to their vision of the Apache Way.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > On 03/10/2014 02:36 PM, Nick Burch wrote: >> >> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> Do folks think that this will make a good panel discussion (obvious, I >>> do), and, if so, who should participate in such a panel? I'd love to see >>> someone from the board, and someone from the Cordova PMC. Suggestions as to >>> who that should be? >> >> >> I'd vote for someone from infra too. My reading of the debate was that >> there'd be additional tooling needed to support a community that wanted to >> release that fast if they were to still maintain the levels of checking we >> want + not burn out trying. A comdev volunteer might round it out as well, >> since there were concerns about how volunteers and new community members >> would be encouraged + supported to participate if there were lots of "work >> hours" community members involved in the fast cadence process. >> >> As for the board member, do you want a fireworks filled session, a lively >> debate, or a quiet but very productive one? ;-) > > > Ideally I'd want something lively and productive. Fireworks might fill seats > but ultimately do us no good. > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >
