Who, in his moment of brightness, dreamed up the notion that a perfectly accepted household name (and thereby a de facto brand) as ApacheCon for the main event of the ASF would benefit from adding an extension like CORE?
ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event. Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from the CORE extension? Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:20 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > We have now passed the deadline for submitting talks to ApacheCON CORE in > Budapest. > > We have received 156 submissions, which now will be reviewed. Thanks a lot > for the > big interest. > > It is already now clear, that some talks have been submitted to both > events, and some > talks submitted to CORE; really fits better in big data. The ApacheCON team > will contact > the authors shortly, to clarify these cases. > > Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP. There are a lot of open > slots here. > > Please do not hesitate to submit your proposal for Apache Big Data. > > thanks > on behalf of the ApacheCON Team. > jan i. >