Who, in his moment of brightness, dreamed up the notion that a perfectly
accepted household name (and thereby a de facto brand) as ApacheCon for the
main event of the ASF would benefit from adding an extension like CORE?

ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache
Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all
promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event.

Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from
the CORE extension?

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:20 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote:

> We have now passed the deadline for submitting talks to ApacheCON CORE in
> Budapest.
>
> We have received 156 submissions, which now will be reviewed. Thanks a lot
> for the
> big interest.
>
> It is already now clear, that some talks have been submitted to both
> events, and some
> talks submitted to CORE; really fits better in big data. The ApacheCON team
> will contact
> the authors shortly, to clarify these cases.
>
> Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP. There are a lot of open
> slots here.
>
> Please do not hesitate to submit your proposal for Apache Big Data.
>
> thanks
> on behalf of the ApacheCON Team.
> jan i.
>

Reply via email to