Just do it. There's no reason for the rest of us to block you.
: o), Myrle On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 3:46 PM Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Guess now I can change my non-binding vote into a binding one ;-) > But still I don't have 3 binding votes for it ... so officially there's > still one binding vote missing ... > So should I still continue with creating the mailinglist? > > Chris > > Am 11.06.19, 10:40 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > > So the results are: > > a) no new list > 1: Naomi > > b) create a tech@a.o<mailto:tech@a.o> list that's expected to be used > with > [subject][line][tags] only > 1: Bertrand (*) (M) > > c) create an iot@a.o<mailto:iot@a.o> list > 6: Chris (M), Andrew, Julian (M), Lars, Myrle (*) , Jorge > > (*) are comdev PMCs (As far as I can see and their votes are binding > comdev votes) > (M) are people volunteering to be moderators for that particular > option they voted for. > > Guess it's up to a comdev PMC to decide what should be done with this > result. > As far as I could see we have two comdev binding votes one for every > option b and c. > > Chris > > > > Am 10.06.19, 02:09 schrieb "Jorge Betancourt" < > betancourt.jo...@gmail.com>: > > My vote goes to option c. > > Best regards, > Jorge > > > > ?B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?��[][�]?K�\?X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???��[][�]?K�\?X�?K�ܙ�B�B > >
