Hi all, thanks for your responses.
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-510 where this will hopefully be sorted out soon. Really feel a little bad for opening so many legal issues recently. Chris Am 25.02.20, 16:55 schrieb "Shane Curcuru" <a...@shanecurcuru.org>: Christofer Dutz wrote on 2020-2-25 6:32AM EST: > Hi all, > > I know this is a strange question, but what license are our ICLA and CCLA texts available under? > I am asking because I’m involved in a new Open-Source project which is licensing it’s stuff under the Apache 2.0 license. The project is organized under a different freshly founded foundation. I suggested we put in place a system with ICLAs and CCLAs and thought the Apache ones would work nicely … unfortunately they don’t have License headers ;-) > > Are our documents under Apache 2.0 License too? The only place to get a definitive answer is from the Legal Affairs Committee. https://www.apache.org/legal/#communications You should open a JIRA asking both about these specific documents, and about the case in general, so we can hopefully document this as a FAQ. Elsethread, while I agree the Apache-2.0 license is a bit odd applied to prose, my personal vote would be to treat everything the ASF publicly produces as licensed under Apache-2.0 unless explicitly otherwise noted. The simplicity of saying "Everything from Apache not marked is Apache-2.0" is a powerful statement (and much simpler to administer). -- - Shane Director & Member The Apache Software Foundation --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
