+1 for [email protected]

Craig

> On Sep 19, 2021, at 11:27 PM, Mark J. Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 2021/09/19 21:44:34, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> This is a good idea. Assuming that this is a public list then either pick 
>> another name, or do not use self serve to request it, instead use an INFRA 
>> JIRA ticket. 
>> 
>> Security@ lists requested through self serve become private mailing lists 
>> with emails mirrored on [email protected].
> 
> That's a great point, the "security@*" prefix has a special meaning, and 
> "secure-development" or "secdev" limits the scope.  "security-discuss@" was 
> mentioned as an alternative, and that would match the way we have a 
> "legal-discuss@".
> 
> I still like this living in the community project though, because the likely 
> outcome of the discussion are collation of resources and practices and the 
> right place for them is in comdev.
> 
> So how does [email protected] sound?
> 
> Cheers, Mark
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

Craig L Russell
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to