On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 18:19, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think projects would just put <project> as the name and dev@project... as > the mail address. But there is already a mail-list field so it seems > redundant. > > So I agree that we should drop "maintainer".
Agreed; it can be dropped from the create form. If there is to be a default, it should be private@ Not all projects have a dev list; ultimately it is the PMC that is responsible for the DOAP. > Craig > > > On Sep 7, 2023, at 10:08, [email protected] wrote: > > > > With some attention on projects.a.o at the moment, I'd like to raise > > the subject of the "maintainer" field in the DOAP files. That field > > doesn't make sense in ASF-style projects. The "maintainer" is always > > going to be the project's PMC. > > > > I came across a few DOAP files that listed an individual name in that > > field, and that's misleading, at best. > > > > I'd like to drop 'maintainer' from the DOAP creation form. Are there > > any objections to that? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > Craig L Russell > [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
