This is why we emphasize community over code. And Kvrocks can be a valuable
example that although quite a few of its "original authors" faded away due
to many reasons, we keep invite new members and due to its product value (a
well-known software's alternative, named Redis), so it can be maintained as
long as a few of code reviewers are there.

The latter is also why sometimes I bring back "code"'s value cause we build
specific SOFTWARE/PROJECT communities. The product value holds to keep
attracting new comers.

> how to get back on track

Back to the question. Another important distinction I'd like to make is

* whether this question is asked by the current PMC; or,
* by someone who may want to take over/contribute to the project and
reactivate it.

Best,
tison.


Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> 于2024年3月29日周五 22:24写道:

> On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:20 AM, Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
> > implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
> > contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
> > point out there can be other problems that might need correction with
> > different solutions (too much chaos, fighting, legal issues, poor
> > quality releases, etc)
> >
>
>
> Yes, those things seem useful to address also.
>
> The most common problem we see in ASF projects is that they just wind down
> and lose steam, and end up being one or two people trying to keep the
> lights on, with no time to go out and find helpers.
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 9:36 AM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our
> projects, and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with
> concrete, actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to
> find contributors. This seems like a great doc that we should write. What
> comes to mind is:
> >>
> >> * Clearly tell the dev@ and user@ list that the project is at risk if
> they don’t step up
> >> * Publish a list of open issues to the Dev list
> >> * Contact companies that you know rely on your outputs, and tell them
> that the project is at risk
> >> * Clearly document the path/requirements for getting committer.
> Consider lowering your wall a little
> >> * What else?
> >>
> >> Another question that I have is where to put this doc. I’m thinking it
> goes in https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/tree/main/source/pmc
> somewhere, but I’m not sure that to name it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> —
> >> Rich Bowen
> >> rbo...@rcbowen.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to