Greetings Erik,

On 2021/07/08 21:03:39 Erik Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a PMC member for Apache Superset, and we've recently been struggling
> with the number of issues reported in our Github repo. We're currently at >
> 800 open issues, and are having trouble keeping up with responding and
> addressing all the user issues and feedback. We were curious if any other
> Apache projects had a way of managing Github issues that works for them. We > were considering setting up a bot that assigns new issues to a random committer/PMC member, but are open to other ideas too.

I most strongly recommend not to do that. Less than 3 months ago, I stumbled into what could be a case study in how ticket assignment fails. https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/863 is a "high priority🚨" issue in a high priority project, and has been assigned for over 8 years, yet seems even further from completion than it seemed 8 years ago. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated case: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22high%20priority%20%3Arotating_light%3A%22

But the worst part is all these were *self-*assigned. Automatic assignment in CBPP would be a recipe for disaster (unless the assignee consented to that automation). Volunteering as a committer or PMC member does *not* mean volunteering to solve any number of issues, let alone randomly picked ones. Allocation gains are one of the greatest factors behind CBPP’s successes.

--
🅭🄍: https://www.philippecloutier.com/Common+infrastructure+licensing#list

Philippe Cloutier


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to