On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Jan Ancajas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> 4. Agent group >>>>> 5. Selection of agent >>>>> >>>> is this grouping by some classification? Like "Windows"? >>>> >>> We can have the user select which agent to add in a group and have that >>> group attached to a build environment? So instead of agent attached to a >>> build environment, it will be group of agents. >>> >> Sounds good to me.. I'll take a stab on 4 & 5 and see what I can >> contribute..:) > > What did you have in mind for this? We had some other conversations > about how groups and selection should work, for example that an > administrator has to be in control of where a project is allowed to > build, and some thoughts about whether to require explicit > configuration of agents into groups, or whether it would be capability > based and more automatic.
My idea is to require explicit configuration of agents into groups, and then linked that to a build environment. And then for future enhancement, add the capability based feature. To make it simple, capability based feature will be defined on per agent basis. So if a project group-A doesn't define a build agent group then it will just use the capabality-based criteria in choosing the agent, otherwise it will try to filter the agent by it's build agent group and capability based criteria. > > -- > Wendy >
