I think the use of war:inplace should be removed. It's a nasty hack to
make jetty:run work with war overlays. I was planning to look at the
Jetty plugin as I think they have an option to add additional source
directories now that would mean this and all the obscure clean plugin
config could go...
- Brett
On 24/09/2009, at 7:07 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
It turns out the Emma plugin is also having the same problem with
war:inplace as Cobertura. I looked at the source code of Emma and it
has the
same default lifecycle where the classesDirectory is being set,
which is
causing the same error 'Cannot override read-only parameter:
classesDirectory in goal: war:inplace'.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
[email protected]> wrote:
+1 too
Emmanuel
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1 for EMMA, since it works in Eclipse and IDEA as well.
On 23/09/2009, at 4:03 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
Hi All,
I'll be configuring code coverage on Continuum trunk and 1.3.x
branch to
identify which classes still lack tests. I'm considering using
either
the
Cobertura plugin or the Emma plugin. There is a problem with
Cobertura
and
war:inplace goal though as we encountered in Archiva (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-636). I've only tried the Emma
plugin
briefly once and the experience was pretty good so I'm kind of
leaning
towards using it. Any suggestions or comments on this?
Thanks,
Deng
