On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem there too. A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already been four months since 1.3.4. Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. -- Wendy
