Checking with infra, since I see it through the proxy and not on the live site.
BTW, I Think you forgot to update the home page? - Brett On 20/01/2010, at 10:03 AM, Marica Tan wrote: > I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn > site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I > visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all. > > http://continuum.apache.org/ > http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5 > > > Can anyone help me with this :) > > Thanks, > -- > Marica > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The vote has passed with the following results: >> >> +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica >> 1 non-binding: Brent >> No -1s and 0s >> >> >> I'll finalize the release. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Marica >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for Beta. >>> >>> - verified signatures and checksums >>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed >>> build scenarios >>> >>> - Marica >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for Beta. >>>> >>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was >>>> able to run and build a project. >>>> >>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - >>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this >>>> before >>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO. >>>> >>>> - Brett >>>> >>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. >>>>> >>>>> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release >>>> notes >>>>> here: >>>>> >>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 >>>>> >>>>> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, >>>> can be >>>>> downloaded here: >>>>> >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> < >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> < >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> < >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ >>>>> >>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -- >>>>> Marica >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'll start the release today :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me >>>>>>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on >>>> the >>>>>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem >>>>>>> there too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA >>>>>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already >>>>>>> been four months since 1.3.4. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 >>>>>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the >>>>>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Wendy >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brett Porter >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
