On 30/11/2010, at 11:36 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: >> I fixed an issue this morning: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2586 >> >> I opted to just change "Maven 2" and "Maven 2.0.x" to plain "Maven", and >> retain "Maven 1.x" as a special case. That seemed neater and more future >> proof than either "Maven 2.0+" or "Maven 2 & 3". > > Thanks -- I was going to propose dropping Maven 1 support altogether > and just calling it "Maven".
I wonder how that would affect users? I guess they could use the shell support? - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
