Tim Kim wrote: > Is it? > I keep seeing questions being popped up about people looking for webworks.js > even if they developing for bb5-7/playbook. > Usually they are trying it in ripple and errors out when it can't find it so > it leads to some confusion.
I wrote: | <!-- Don't worry about js/webworks.js if you're aren't developing for bb10 --> Here the comment says "js/webworks.js" | - <script type="text/javascript" src="js/webworks.js"></script> Here the code used to say "js/webworks.js", at which point the code and comment agreed. | + <script type="text/javascript" src="local:///chrome/webworks.js"></script> This change caused the comment to no longer be in sync with the code, as it now says "local:///chrome/webworks.js". Anyone looking for "js/webworks.js" in the code won't find it. This is roughly a reminder to people "please don't forget to update comments when you change nearby lines of code", this applies both to comments which are visible in diff -U3 and in comments which aren't visible in diff -U3, although from my perspective it should have been spotted by a reviewer since it was visible in this case.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
