16Mb is way less than I expected. Were able to compile on OS X ?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice work Joe. One step closer.. .. .. > On 12/6/12 4:38 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I played around with it this afternoon and I got it to build. The > >score on html5test has it right on par with my desktop chrome for the > >most part. That being said, there's a lot of problems with it, such > >as the footprint. It currently weighs in at 16 MB. It'd be cool if > >we could use it as a library with the uses-library in the Android > >manifest, but I think we're still stuck with the stock browser if we > >want things to just work. > > > >So, while it may make for a cool tech demo, using Chrome for Cordova > >is a long ways off. > > > >It's nice to have something that compiles though, even with a minor tweak! > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was going to try it out but last time I checked it needed a good > >>ubuntu > >> machine to compile (didn't work on OSX). At any rate, remember that it > >> would have footprint of ~30Mb. I think it is worth the effort too. I > >>would > >> look into it if I had the pre-requisites. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Jarrod Overson <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> > >>> Us folk on the sidelines want to know what's going on with using > >>>Chrome's > >>> content shell on android too. Seems to be tracked here: > >>> > >>> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=113088 > >>> > >>> That issue made me assume that it wasn't possible yet without effort > >>>on the > >>> chrome/chromium side. > >>> -- > >>> Jarrod Overson > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hey > >>> > > >>> > I know that I brought this up before, but I'm wondering what's going > >>> > on with Chrome Content Shell, and whether we can start looking at > >>>this > >>> > as an option for having a WebView on Android that sucks less than the > >>> > current one that we have access to. It's kinda weird having PhoneGap > >>> > only score 253 on HTML5 Test when Chrome is now stock. > >>> > > >>> > Anyone tried this out? Does it build? Is this horribly off-topic? > >>> > > >>> > Joe > >>> > > >>> > >
