All right, it looks like everything is re-packaged and working.



On 12 February 2013 13:43, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jesse MacFadyen <purplecabb...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > +1 to repack.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Jesse
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone5
> >
> > On 2013-02-12, at 9:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >
> > Ah crap. Well, my thinking is just repackage it anyhow. (Not a world
> > ending bug tracking nightmare.)
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Someone had brought it up through the google groups:
> > >
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phonegap/wnICEdCs-Qk/discussion
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11 February 2013 15:24, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Tim, has anyone reported this or are you the only one who has noticed?
> > >> (if the latter, I say we re-package, if the former we should probably
> > >> do a retag =(
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> Since it's a low risk change (version number only), I say re-tag, and
> > >>> re-package - who is in charge of the robson tool? File a bug against
> it
> > >>>
> > >>> Or is the version number not worth it?
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hey gang,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So it appears I forgot to push out a commit to update the version
> > number
> > >>>> in the BlackBerry repo, but accidently tagged 2.4.0 anyways. Should
> I
> > >> force
> > >>>> re-tag the repo?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Also, the download on phonegap.com for the BlackBerry repo was
> kinda
> > >>>> messed
> > >>>> up anyways. In that the robson tool didn't copy over the www/ folder
> > and
> > >>>> just the bin/ folder (changed from using ant dist to ./bin/create).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sorry for the mix ups! I was at a conference and was kinda jet
> lagged
> > >> when
> > >>>> I was attempting to update the repo.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Timothy Kim
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Timothy Kim
> >
>



-- 
Timothy Kim

Reply via email to