I think Patrick is asking: what is an measurable unit of time we are willing to accept as a hit, compared to loading a concatenated file. I can't imagine how this could possibly add more than a few millisecond, and personally if the overhead is measured in 100's its not acceptable. So, <100ms? (hopefully far less than).
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>wrote: > I haven't measured this. I certainly didn't see a visible delay in load > times, but I was also launching a freshly pushed app and waiting for the > debugger to connect, so it was hardly a good test for using the app like a > user. > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org > > >wrote: > > > > > We decided that if loading two dozen script tags is too slow (probably > > not) > > > then we can make the decision whether to sacrifice error message > clarity > > > for speed. > > > > > > > Do you have any #'s? Seems like something we can time. Avoiding > > concatenation seems like a good thing to me. > > > > -- > > Patrick Mueller > > http://muellerware.org > > >
