fuckin eh, sounds awesome---thx man

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Braden Shepherdson
<bra...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I added the plugin-loading code there (see scripts/plugin_loader.js) but I
> wasn't aware that XHRs to file:// URLs always have status 0 instead of
> 200/404/etc. Andrew fixed that today, but we decided not to try to
> cherry-pick that change into 2.6.x.
>
> It's harmless for the main function of cordova-js, but it means that the
> future branch of the CLI tools won't work with the released 2.6.
>
> Braden
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>
>> Braden: whats happening in cordova-js that is broken/being heavily
>> refactored?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> > You'll need the future branch of cordova-cli and plugman, and to go
>> through
>> > a bit of a dance to get those two installed and npm linked properly. The
>> > dance is as follows:
>> >
>> > cd plugman
>> > npm install
>> > sudo npm link
>> > cd ../cordova-cli
>> > npm install
>> > sudo npm link
>> > npm link plugman
>> >
>> > Now when you run 'cordova' you get the git version, and 'plugman'
>> likewise.
>> > You can skip everything after the first three lines if you're only using
>> > plugman and not CLI.
>> >
>> > Note that the master branch is currently broken with cordova-js 2.6.0;
>> > you'll have to use the future branch. Unfortunately that branch is under
>> > heavy development right now, but I'm trying to keep it in a working
>> state.
>> >
>> > Braden
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Use the future branch of plugman. That's where braden is putting the
>> >> symbol mapping work into.
>> >>
>> >> On 3/26/13 9:09 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Steve has plugman working with devicemotion plugin. Happy days! Its
>> >> >time he ripped the JS out of cordova-js and put it in the plugin. But
>> >> >does plugman support js installation? What needs happening to make it
>> >> >so?
>> >>
>> >>
>>

Reply via email to