On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Gorkem Ercan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Some feedback: > > > > + <access origin=".*"/> > > + <access origin="http://127.0.0.1*"/> <!-- allow local pages -->` > > > > Why have the second line? it's made redundant by the first, and when we > do > > serve files locally, we do so via file: URLs. > > > > > I have copied this use from the android's existing config.xml [1]. It does > not make much sense to me either but since I did not have time to > investigate it deeply and did not want to break anything, I kept it as it > is. We can easily remove it if you think it will not harm anything for > Android. > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/framework/res/xml/config.xml ah, okay. Yeah, I think it should just be removed. > > > > > > > > > > + <log level="DEBUG"/> > > > > I don't see <log> in the widget spec. Seems like a good idea to be able > to > > se a log level, but probably would be more appropriate as a <preference>, > > and out of the scope of this change. > > > > > > > Correct, this is not on the spec but Android at the moment is actually > using log element to configure its logging level and therefore it is > present on the current android config.xml. I also agree that logging is not > in the scope of this change and it is probably a fair amount of work. If > you think the effect on Android is trivial, I can remove it from the > templates. > > Cool, didn't know that. I think for now, let's at least keep this confined to Android's config.xml then or convert it to a <preference> before we expose it to other platforms. > > > > > Using <param> for the class name does more align with the spec, but using > > $platform-package to address platform differences seems out of place > > compared with how these are addressed by CLI's config.xml (using > > gap:platform attributes or <platform> tags). What would be better (I > think) > > would be to have <param name="package" value="foo"/>, and use CLI/plugman > > to deal with putting in the correct versions per platform. > > > > E.g., if iOS adds something to its template config.xml file, I don't want > > to have to add this value to each platform's config.xml file. > > > > > > > I wanted to keep it within the spec because any extensions to the widget > spec needs a wider concencus . I used the $platform-package convention but > could be any of the other options as long as it allows us to mark the > element with a platform. I think this is something that needs to be agreed > and continued. > > I'm not so much focused on what the attribute is called, but rather I feel more strongly that we shouldn't put iOS-specific things in Android's config.xml and vice-versa. Reason being is that if you extrapolate this to our ~10 platforms, that's a tonne of duplicated settings, and any tweak you want to make to one, you need to then make in ~10 repositories. Instead, what we should do is move to using cordova-cli's config.xml be the unified version: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-cli.git;a=blob;f=templates/www/config.xml;h=206bc5698780acda1863c4612cc36291a15b0472;hb=HEAD Note though that we don't have <feature> in here, since they are defined in plugin.xml. e.g.: https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/chrome-cordova/blob/master/plugins/socket/plugin.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes please. I want to get this pain all over with :) > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sounds good! > > > > > > > > Ping Shaz, Andrew, Michal, Joe, Simon, and anyone else involved in > > > Android > > > > & iOS. > > > > > > > > On 4/4/13 5:08 AM, "Gorkem Ercan" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Hi Filip, > > > > >Thanks for looking at this. I have just updated the PR(s) with > > corrected > > > > >config.xml ids for templates on all projects. > > > > > > > > > >I am also planning to send a PR for updates to doc once these are > > > > >integrated. > > > > >-- > > > > >Gorkem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Gorkem, > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks for this and putting the effort into kick starting this. > > Sorry > > > > >> about the late reply. > > > > >> > > > > >> I like the changes (made a minor comment re: widget element id in > > the > > > > >> github pull request). Correctly adopting the spec should help. > > > > >>Leveraging > > > > >> several <param> elements inside a <feature> element, one param per > > > > >> platform, to describe the resolution of native plugin source from > > > > >> cordova.exec service label [1] is elegant. > > > > >> > > > > >> I'm up for +1'ing these changes. Should help with our ongoing > plugin > > > > >> tooling work too! > > > > >> > > > > >> Unless other people have problems with this approach, I'll aim to > > > merge > > > > >> this stuff in on Friday. Perhaps some of the core maintainers for > > > > >>Android > > > > >> and iOS can review those particular changes (I trust your > judgement > > > more > > > > >> than my high-level understanding :P). If that all checks out, we > can > > > set > > > > >> up issues for the Windows Phone platforms, BlackBerry, and other > > > > >>platforms. > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/41/files#L2R57 > > > > >> > > > > >> On 4/1/13 2:24 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> >I would like this to be reviewed/merged as well because > config.xml > > > > >> >differences are becoming a pain in terms of plugin management. > > > > >> > > > > > >> >Android has a /cordova/plugins. iOS had a /cordova/plugins in 2.4 > > and > > > > >>now > > > > >> >has a /widget/plugins. BlackBerry 10 has a /widget/plugins and > is > > > > >> >following the spec by using "feature" instead of "plugin". > > > > >> > > > > > >> >Whatever we decide I would like to have some kind of uniformity > > > across > > > > >> >platforms. > > > > >> > > > > > >> >-a > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Gorkem Ercan > > > > >> ><[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> Hi All, > > > > >> >> I am working on a set of plugins for Eclipse that will > eventually > > > be > > > > >> >>part > > > > >> >> of the JBoss IDE. I seem to have similar requirements to > > > cordova-cli > > > > >>and > > > > >> >> noticed that some of the things that are planned for cli is > well > > > > >>aligned > > > > >> >> with our plans. So I am hoping to contribute as much as I can. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> We also use W3 widget packaging spec based config.xml as a > > blanket > > > to > > > > >> >> configure a Cordova App for all platforms. However there are > > > > >> >>differences on > > > > >> >> the config.xml that each platform consumes compared to the W3 > > spec > > > > >>and > > > > >> >>as > > > > >> >> you can imagine a more uniform platform behaviour makes our > life > > a > > > > >>bit > > > > >> >> better. So I have tried to take a shot at unifying the > > differences > > > > >> >>between > > > > >> >> platforms and created pull requests for android[1]. iOS[2] and > > > > >>CLI[3]. I > > > > >> >> think with these PRs JIRA[4] for migrating from <plugin> to > > > <feature> > > > > >> >> should be resolved (at least for iOS and Android) and its > > parent[5] > > > > >> >>should > > > > >> >> be updated. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The changes are compatible with the existing config.xmls on iOS > > and > > > > >> >> Android, I think it will be even possible to mix and match the > > new > > > > >> >>syntax > > > > >> >> <feature> with the old ones. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/41 > > > > >> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/45 > > > > >> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/7 > > > > >> >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1109 > > > > >> >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1108 > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> -- > > > > >> >> Gorkem > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > >-- > > > > >Gorkem > > > > >http://www.gorkem-ercan.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- > Gorkem > http://www.gorkem-ercan.com >
