Yes, agree
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > The "free" maintenance is a compelling reason to add node as a dependency. > > I'll also flip and support this move but let's not focus on this just yet. > Maybe file the issues and slate them for post-3.0. > > On 4/13/13 3:05 PM, "Jarrod Overson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Cordova may also gain extra hands and support in the process by switching > >to node, or at least by adopting the stance that node is the 100% > >supported > >future. > > > >Grunt <http://gruntjs.com/> could also be appropriate as a task runner, > >allowing shared tasks to be organized and distributed separately and to > >leverage the community tasks <http://gruntjs.com/plugins> that already > >exist. > > > >-- > >Jarrod Overson > >tw <https://twitter.com/jsoverson> | gh <http://github.com/jsoverson> > >| g+<http://profiles.google.com/jsoverson> > > | li <http://jarrodoverson.com/linkedin> > > > > > >On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Simon MacDonald > ><[email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >> I used to be against requiring node to run the create scripts but I've > >> reversed my position. > >> > >> I think it would be good to switch to node. Maintaining separate > >> bash/jscript scripts is a pain in the ass and violates DRY. As well > >>most of > >> us don't even have PC's anymore so running the create script on Windows > >>is > >> not getting the attention it deserves. Check out the problems people > >>are > >> having on a Windows on our mailing list or on StackOverflow. > >> > >> Theoretically by moving to a node script should eliminate duplication > >>and > >> put everyone on a level playing field. > >> > >> > >> Simon Mac Donald > >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> > >> > >
