hmm, I did indeed just upgrade my node version. blowing away node_modules
didn't seem to fix it though.


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>wrote:

> This happened to me back when I upgraded node. I ended up doing rm -rf
> node_modules and then npm install. I eventually managed to claw my way back
> to a working Jake. Why it fails utterly silently, and with code 0, puzzles
> me.
>
> Braden
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz
> <jheif...@blackberry.com>wrote:
>
> > I've been seeing similar issues with Jake since I've upgraded my node and
> > it is definitely related to Jake failing with dependencies. I have yet to
> > find the real root cause.
> >
> > On 13-06-18 8:27 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > >As both Jesse and Shaz pointed out, I ran coho to update cordova.js
> > >snapshots, but it resulted in them being set to 2.7.0 instead of 2.9.0.
> > >
> > >This is now fixed (new commits for 2.9.0rc1), and I've updated the coho
> > >script to not push by default (so that commits can be inspected).
> > >
> > >The root problem is that jake is existing without failure and without
> > >printing anything to the console. Can anyone else verify if this is
> > >happening for them?
> > >
> > >I debugged it as far as to see that removing the "complainwhitespace"
> > >dependency from the "hint" task fixed things, but I don't know why that
> > >is.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> > information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >
>

Reply via email to