Could you also update the README?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3966

Thanks!


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Okay, CB-3960 is the tracker.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz <jheif...@blackberry.com
> >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
> > From: Bryan Higgins
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 9:39 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Jake woes
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholm...@redhat.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:20 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 Grunt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I've burned quite a bit of time trying to get it to work, and I'm a
> > bit
> > > >> realizing that it's probably not worth continuing. By fiddling with
> > > >> dependencies I can get it to run, but tasks are being run multiple
> > times
> > > >> when they shouldn't be, and there's no reason I should need to
> fiddle
> > > the
> > > >> deps to get it to run.
> > > >>
> > > >> So... any objections if I delete Jakefile and replace it with
> > > >> a Gruntfile.js?
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> > information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >
>

Reply via email to