I think it should be necessary but we never got that far in terms of validating config.xml or anything like that
On 7/16/13 8:38 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" <jheif...@blackberry.com> wrote: >When the config.xml for mobile-spec was re-written recently the <author> >element was removed and I'm just wondering if this is valid. In the >BlackBerry implementation we've always required one and I'm wondering if >this behaviour is wrong, or if I should add one to mobile-spec. > >Thanks, > >Jeff > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential >information, privileged material (including material protected by the >solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute >non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than >the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this >transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete >this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or >reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not >authorized and may be unlawful.
