I'll ping the legal list to see what the process is for deploying to proprietary channels.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Simon MacDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it makes sense for Apache to own it in the app store. It also > leaves groups like Adobe, Google, etc. the opportunity to drop their > own versions of the app-harness with additional proprietary > functionality. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Lorin Beer <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree with your breakdown of options in order of sanity, Braden :) >> >> Ideally this should be owned by the organization that owns the code: the >> Apache Cordova Project. While an acceptable second would be for the Adobe >> Cordova Team to publish it, I think there is a precedent for an Apache >> project owning and managing an appstore account. >> >> Apache OpenOffice is made available through the mac appstore. >> >> - Lorin >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Braden Shepherdson >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> So we've got a working app harness in the cordova-app-harness repo. One of >>> the founding goals for the app harness was that it could be placed into the >>> Play Store and App Store. >>> >>> Then the question is: who owns the apps in the various markets? It seems to >>> me that there are four possibilities: >>> >>> 1. Apache Cordova project (Can we do that under Apache's rules? Apple's >>> rules? Is there precedent at Apache for App Store accounts and such?) >>> >>> 2. Adobe PhoneGap team >>> 3. Google Cordova/Mobile Chrome Apps team >>> (4. Some individual person from one of the above, separately from the >>> larger organization.) >>> >>> These are in descending order of how sane I think they are. If it's >>> possible for the Apache project to control the AppStore accounts, that >>> would be best. If not, the PhoneGap team is probably the best way to go. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Braden >>>
