That's it for hangout participants, then. On 8/7/13 12:01 PM, "dguald...@gmail.com" <dguald...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Dgualdron, co-location=n/a Bucaramanga, Colombia > >Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ken Wallis <kwal...@blackberry.com> >Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:06:25 >To: dev@cordova.apache.org<dev@cordova.apache.org> >Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org >Subject: RE: Post 3.0 release committer and community meeting > >Bringing the list to the top and adding myself: > >agrieve, co-location=Google Waterloo >mmocny, co-location=Google Waterloo >maxw, co-location=Google Waterloo >aharding, co-location=Adobe Vancouver >filmaj, co-location=Adobe Vancouver >stevegill, co-location=Adobe San Francisco >bhiggins, co-location=BlackBerry Toronto >jheifetz, co-location=BlackBerry Toronto >devgeeks, co-location=n/a Melbourne, Australia >aogilvie, co-location=n/a Tokyo, Japan. >drkemp, co-location=Google Waterloo >iclelland, co-location=Google Waterloo >jamesjong, co-location=IBM Raleigh >kwallis, co-location=n/a near-Toronto, Canada > >-- > >Ken Wallis > >Senior Product Manager WebWorks > >BlackBerry > >650-620-2404 > >________________________________________ >From: Shazron [shaz...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:17 AM >To: dev@cordova.apache.org >Subject: Re: Post 3.0 release committer and community meeting > >Ditto - will try to call in since it's at a sane 7:30 am here (audio only >most like). The show must go on > > >On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I can't make this meeting. I'm out of the office until the 16th. >> On Aug 7, 2013 8:06 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@google.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> > >>> Attendees: If you plan to attend, could you add your name to this >> list >> > >>> (inline so that the list grows) and say whether you plan to be >> > >> co-located: >> > >>> agrieve, co-location=Google Waterloo >> > >>> mmocny, co-location=Google Waterloo >> > >>> maxw, co-location=Google Waterloo >> > >>> aharding, co-location=Adobe Vancouver >> > >>> filmaj, co-location=Adobe Vancouver >> > >>> stevegill, co-location=Adobe San Francisco >> > >>> bhiggins, co-location=BlackBerry Toronto >> > >>> jheifetz, co-location=BlackBerry Toronto >> > >>> devgeeks, co-location=n/a Melbourne, Australia >> > >>> aogilvie, co-location=n/a Tokyo, Japan. >> > >>> drkemp, co-location=Google Waterloo >> > >> >> > >> iclelland, co-location=Google Waterloo >> > >> jamesjong, co-location=IBM Raleigh >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Agenda (feel free to add items inline): >> > >> >> > >>> - Release artifacts and process redux >> > >>> - Should platform releases still be coupled? >> > >>> - Does semver make more sense to us now that components are more >> > >> decoupled? >> > >>> - Deprecation policy improvements? >> > >>> - Can we use cordova-registry to allow older versions of things >>when >> > >> APIs are removed? >> > >>> - Can we have our plugin API surface versioned separately from our >> > >> component versions? >> > >>> - Shortterm plans for Medic >> > >>> - Buildbot? >> > >>> - Should mobile-spec autotests be pulled out? >> > >>> - 4.0 goals, timeline, and priorities >> > >>> - Platforms as build artifacts - Is this our goal? what's >> > >> big hurdles remain? >> > >>> - Apps & Plugins to have the same feature set (dependencies, >>merges/, >> > >> etc) >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential >information, privileged material (including material protected by the >solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute >non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than >the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this >transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete >this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or >reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not >authorized and may be unlawful.
