+1 for #2
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for number 2 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David Kemp <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 for #2 as well >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Braden Shepherdson >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> +1 for #2. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > +1 for option #2 >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > For repos that use SemVer, there are two options: >>> > > >>> > > 1. Update the version number at the time that the change is made >>> > > 2. Update the version number only when doing a release. >>> > > >>> > > Right now, #2 is what I've put in the wiki instructions, but it can be >>> > > changed of course :) >>> > > >>> > > Two main reasons I think #2 will work better: >>> > > - #1 might be too complicated (might forget to update it, may update >>> the >>> > > version multiple times if multiple feature changes go in) >>> > > - #2 If doing a release, you should know what you're releasing. Having >>> > to >>> > > choose the right version number will force you to understand what >>> you're >>> > > releasing. >>> > > >>> > >>>
