+1 to Marcel's thoughts. His situation is definitely not unique. ;)

At minimum I think it would be useful to try and solicit feedback on this from 
a wider audience than the dev list. I imagine there are more than just the 
watchers on this DL that might be bundling official packages in downstream 
distributions.
--

Ken Wallis
Senior Product Manager – WebWorks
BlackBerry
650-620-2404

________________________________________
From: Marcel Kinard [cmarc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:20 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: When to do "Official Apache Releases"

+1 to still do these for each cadence release.

I'm in a somewhat unique situation where Cordova gets bundled as a downstream 
distribution into a vendor product. The vendor product uses the Cordova native 
platforms and core plugins that get embedded in the product, the product 
doesn't fetch any code from git or npm. And the product itself doesn't get 
installed in an npm-like way.  There isn't dynamic updates or dependency 
fetching. As we bundle those downstream distributions, I'm very used to using 
the official apache release tarballs.

I'm fine with it being just the native platforms and docs. We don't embed the 
Cordova docs in the product, we just link out to cordova.apache.org/docs.

And it would feel weird for an Apache project to not publish source releases.

I nobody else wants to invest the time to publish an official apache release to 
dist.apache.org, then I can own that.

-- Marcel

On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:

> It's been mentioned before, but with CLI, there's not a lot of utility in
> doing official apache releases (uploading signed zips to dist.apache.org).
>
> I don't think we should stop doing these entirely, but should we still do
> these for each Cadence Release? An alternative would be to do them only
> once / twice a year.
>
> Any thoughts on why / why not?
>
> Andrew


---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission 
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Reply via email to