Can we serve the html doc somewhere? I'd rather not read a diff on html.
On 26 September 2013 18:08, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like I forgot to click publish on the review page. I also found a > bunch of spelling mistakes I made in my rush to create this. I just fixed > them and uploaded a new diff. The review site should be available for all > now to leave feedback. > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Today we are doing a big plugin release in preperation for Apache Cordova > > 3.1.0 which is scheduled to come out next week. > > > > The main change for this release is removing core from all of the plugin > > ID fields. This was done to make installing plugins easier in 3.1.0. We > are > > switching over to using plugin IDs and ourplugin registery< > http://plugins.cordova.io/> for > > plugin installation instead of directly installing from the plugin git > urls. > > > > These plugins are compatitable with Cordova 3.0.0. Feel free to upgrade > > your current plugins if you can’t wait for 3.1.0 next week. Keep in mind > > that after you install these update plugins, if you decide to remove > these > > plugins from your project, you will have to reference the new IDs instead > > of the old ones that our docs show. Ex: ‘cordova rm > > org.apache.cordova.camera’ instead of ‘org.apache.cordova.core.camera’. > > > > *Other Notable Changes:* > > > > - Firefox OS support for Vibration and Device Plugin > > - Windows 8 support for multiple plugins > > - Fixed warnings that arose with XCode 5 > > - CB-4847 iOS 7 microphone access requires user permission (media > > plugin) > > - CB-4799 Fix incorrect JS references within native code for iOS & > > Andrid (media plugin) > > - CB-4806 Update splashscreen image bounds for iOS 7 (splashscreen > > plugin) > > - CB-4593 Added vibration support for BB10 (vibration plugin) > > > > You can check out the individual release notes in each of the plugin > repos > > for more details. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> I have no idea how this review stuff works. I will post the blog here > >> On Sep 26, 2013 4:59 PM, "Tim Kim" <timki...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> > > >>> > "You don't have access to this review request. > >>> > This review request is private. You must be a requested reviewer, > >>> either > >>> > directly or on a requested group, and have permission to access the > >>> > repository in order to view this review request." > >>> > >>> Ya, same here > >>> > >>> > >>> On 26 September 2013 16:37, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Does everyone have access to this? I get: > >>> > > >>> > "You don't have access to this review request. > >>> > This review request is private. You must be a requested reviewer, > >>> either > >>> > directly or on a requested group, and have permission to access the > >>> > repository in order to view this review request." > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Can you guys review it at https://reviews.apache.org/r/14356/ > >>> > > > >>> > > I don't think post-review was working properly for me... > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Timothy Kim > >>> > >> > > > -- Timothy Kim
