Nah.. Don't worry about an edge case like me! That was just an extreme
example. I can always just re-do my changes to a new fork of the new
hotness... ((I hate client certificate authentication, not you, heh)).

I am just worried about fallout from users :(

Changes to the File API needs to be NOISY. According to the stats from the
plugin repository, it's one of the top downloaded plugins.

O_o
On 20/11/2013 1:43 AM, "Ian Clelland" <iclell...@google.com> wrote:

> Oh, don't hate me, man :)
>
> If I can manage, I'll try to make FileTransfer *just work* with whatever
> version of File you happen to have installed -- but that won't help you if
> you want to keep your modified version of FileTransfer working with the new
> version of File.
>
> It's unfortunate that it depends on the internals of File :(
>
> What are you doing to modify FileTransfer? If there's any way I can make
> your job easier -- any hooks to expose, or extension points that should be
> left in, let me know, and I'll see what I can do.
>
> Ian
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Tommy Williams <to...@devgeeks.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'll hate you, but I guess I'll get over it (I have a plugin that is
> > basically a modified fork of file-transfer.. . gonna be a pain updating
> it
> > now, heh).
> >
> > What happened to the suggestions for this all being a new plugin of some
> > kind? Though plugins are versioned, an old version gets no bug fixes...
> > On 19/11/2013 9:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Answers inline.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Does FileTransfer implement any published standard, or is it our own
> > API?
> > > >
> > > > Nope.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Does it make sense for FileTransfer to continue to use raw FileSystem
> > > paths
> > > > (and *not* go through File at all?) given that the File API will soon
> > be
> > > > returning only relative paths and filesystem:// URLs.
> > > >
> > > > Consistent w/ URL scheme makes sense to me but I'll let others chime
> in
> > > how this will break everything and our users will hate us. But
> remember:
> > > plugins are versioned!
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to