I don't understand, whats the problem? I thought you publish plugins by git-repo & subdir & hash -- so multiple plugins makes no difference.
The master & dev branch deal was to do with cordova-3.0 users that did not support plugin repo install from !master branch, right? But none of these plugins in cordova-plugins existed back then, so we just set engine requirement to 3.1? -Michal On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on one plugin per repo. Would making releasing and tagging much simpler. > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Yep that's the problem with having independent plugins in a single repo, > > and just using directories to separate them. > > > > If I would have a choice I would strongly encourage one plugin per repo > > containing its own version and source control. > > > > > > On Friday, November 22, 2013, Shazron wrote: > > > > > The cordova-plugins repo has plugins as well, but are outside of the > > > purview of the planned weekly core plugins release - I plan to upload > > > independently. > > > > > > The repo does not have the concept of "dev" and "master" plugins as > well > > > like the core plugins. It was suggested we have tags, but this is > > > problematic because we have multiple plugins in that one repo. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > <csantan...@gmail.com> > > >