If reverting the one change just means that we don't have the namespace requirement on the <widget> tag, then I think we're okay with that.
Agreed that it shouldn't need a blog post; a mention in the release notes should be enough. Ian On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to reverting the one change and releasing 3.3.1-0.4.0. > > I can do this, just wanted to hear from someone at Google before I move > forward. > > I believe we shouldn't bother with a blog post for this release due to it > being such a minor release & 3.4.0 just around the corner (hopefully). > > Thoughts? > > -Steve > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'll jump at the offer of wp8 dev devices. A new person will be joining > > our team in a couple weeks with the expectation that she'll work on WP. > > Feel free to contact me offline to work out details. Thanks much for the > > offer, Olivier! > > > > Reverting the one change as Jesse describes feels like the right thing to > > do. > > > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 3:33 PM, purplecabbage <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I would like to see us revert the one change and release 3.3.1-0.4.0 > > > Then we can move forward with 3.4.0 with the commit back in. > > > > > > Ps: can't believe no one has jumped at the free device offer of wp8 dev > > devices. I have several, otherwise I would jump at Olivier's offer. :) > > > > >
