Strictly speaking it may be that a plugin could actually want to not be run
until it was require()d. In practice, I suspect most plugins either want to
clobber, merge or run, all of which will require it. So I think we're okay
with this change. That seems like an odd practice by browserify, but I
suppose it should be mostly harmless.

Braden

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote:

> So I did try your node.js sample code, and you're right, it runs all
> modules by default.  This surprises me, but I guess having all modules have
> an implicit <runs/> is better than dropping support for it.
>
> The thing to keep an eye out for is degraded startup performance with this
> change.
>
> -Michal
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The reason why JS-only platforms (firefoxos, tizen, windows8, ...) use
> > <runs/> is because they need to populate their commandProxyMap in order
> for
> > exec to direct calls to the appropriate module. All js-only modules call
> > something like this:
> >
> > require("cordova/firefoxos/commandProxy").add("Vibration",
> module.exports);
> > Obviously this has to run before the module can be used.
> >
> > browserify runs all modules by default (yes, even if they're not
> required)
> > when the bundle first loads. Which means a module can set itself up,
> > clobber, merge whateva...or just define itself and set its module.exports
> > map for it to be consumed by other modules.
> > Check out my response in the long thread if you want to experiment.
> >
> > _There is a way_ to call only a subset of modules or just one module
> (like
> > a main.js) but the real point is:
> >
> > Do we have a reason to prevent a module from running (defining itself
> > really) until require()d ? That's the example I am requesting and the
> > question I am asking.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > gfind -name plugin.xml -exec grep -Hn "runs" {} \;
> > > ./cordova-plugin-battery-status/plugin.xml:90:            <runs/>
> > > ./cordova-plugin-camera/plugin.xml:37:          <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-contacts/plugin.xml:159:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-device/plugin.xml:29:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-device-motion/plugin.xml:34:          <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-device-motion/plugin.xml:133:            <runs/>
> > > ./cordova-plugin-device-orientation/plugin.xml:36:          <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-device-orientation/plugin.xml:145:            <runs/>
> > > ./cordova-plugin-dialogs/plugin.xml:34:          <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-geolocation/plugin.xml:147:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-globalization/plugin.xml:91:            <runs/>
> > > ./cordova-plugin-media/plugin.xml:138:            <runs/>
> > > ./cordova-plugin-network-information/plugin.xml:32:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-network-information/plugin.xml:143:            <runs
> />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-splashscreen/plugin.xml:103:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-vibration/plugin.xml:27:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugin-vibration/plugin.xml:115:            <runs />
> > > ./cordova-plugins/websql/plugin.xml:12:            <runs />
> > >
> > >
> > > Most of these are for firefoxos or tizen (Haven't investigated), but
> one
> > is
> > > not:
> > > [android]: ./cordova-plugins/websql
> > > -- Why is it needed? Because it only clobbers WebSql when run from
> > file://
> > > protocol
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyway, more generally, its useful for when you need to do some setup
> > > before pluginready / DOMContentLoaded, which is especially useful when
> > you
> > > are dealing with code that isn't cordova.require() aware.
> > >
> > >
> > > For Chrome Apps, we used to use <runs/> a lot, but miraculously I see
> now
> > > that we have replaced all usage with <clobbers/> and <merges/> (which
> is
> > > like runs + extra).  I proposed we could replace clobbers/merges with a
> > > single runs in another thread.
> > >
> > > -Michal
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Anis KADRI <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If we need it. Could anybody point me to an example of how/why that
> is
> > > > needed ?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to