Pls elaborate on how we can be more efficient?

We shipped 67 releases last year and, so far, 2 this year so I'm very
interested in moving this back in the right direction.


On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm asking because of this:
> > https://twitter.com/TheASF/status/472089851693891584
> >
> > So, another criticism of the ASF is the fact that as committers we
> > have zero say on the process because committers aren't members, and
> > only members can really cause any change.  I question the
> > effectiveness of this given that the board for the most part hasn't
> > changed in years.
> >
> > Furthermore, as a project of the ASF, we have no idea what's going on
> > with the project that holds the copyright for our code.
>
> The same situation exists with Cordova's project-specific private list
> from the perspective of Cordova users who are not PMC members, no?
> Ideally, only subjects which truly require discretion such as personnel
> issues, security, trademarks and so on get discussed on private lists.
> In practice, things are messy and sometimes conscious effort is required
> to move conversations public, but the diversity of the ASF Membership
> guards against subterfuge at the org level just as the diversity of the
> Cordova PMC guards against it at the project level.
>
> On a separate note, the notion that the ASF "holds the copyright for our
> code" is not correct.  When you contribute code to an ASF project, you
> maintain ownership but grant a copyright license under terms spelled out
> in the ALv2 and the ICLA.  This is different from, say, the FSF, which
> requires copyright assignment in order to ensure it will have "standing"
> to sue for copyright violation and enforce the GPL.  The ASF does not
> have the same priorities and has deliberately chosen not to require
> copyright assignment.
>
> > The fact that we hardly ever ship anymore
> > thanks to "The Apache Way" and the cognitive dissonance that it's
> > caused in its wake really hasn't helped matters.
>
> My impression as someone with a deep understanding of Apache and an
> admittedly superficial understanding of Cordova, is that Cordova's
> release process is not very efficient in the way it goes about
> satisfying Apache's requirements.  For what it's worth there have been a
> few times I've thought about delurking to contribute specific
> suggestions, but I have been concerned that they might not be taken
> well.  Instead, I've just tried to make myself available as a resource
> to Cordova contributors trying to make the best of things, and to
> continue with more general initiatives (policy clarification, the
> ApacheCon talk) which may help Cordova indirectly.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>

Reply via email to